Movie reviews

...now browsing by category

 

A Defense of Eat, Pray, Love (Or Why Everyone Needs to Quit their Belly-Achin’)

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010
Elizabeth Gilbert, author of "Eat, Pray, Love"

Elizabeth Gilbert, author of "Eat, Pray, Love"

I finally got the chance to see Eat, Pray, Love over the weekend and would like to defend the movie, the book, the author (Elizabeth Gilbert) and even the actress playing the author (Julia Roberts).

First off, I read the book several months ago before watching the movie and didn’t think Gilbert’s attitude in the book was self-centered or hedonistic at all. Let’s be clear about one thing – Gilbert financed the trip herself. She received a major book advance for the premise of Eat, Pray, Love and traveled around the world with that money.

Why did someone like Gilbert receive all that money? Because she had proved in the past that she was actually a good writer. She was a good writer who was not only capable of stringing together a coherent sentence but also received critical acclaim and awards for her short stories, long stories, and books.

Gilbert did not travel around the world on trust fund money from her WASPy parents or wealthy husband. Gilbert wasn’t some rich, white woman who suddenly decided to go to Italy, India, and Bali on a whim because she was rich and white. Nearly every review I’ve read about the movie criticizes Gilbert for being a “rich, white American” who didn’t have a care in the world and was able to do what she did because she was rich and white. Did I mention how rich and white she is?

No, the book advance was money Gilbert had earned on her own and she was entitled to do whatever the hell she wanted with it.

Second, the man she ended up meeting in Bali – Felipe – looked NOTHING like actor Javier Bardem. Columbia Pictures took some pretty extreme measures in casting Bardem to portray a man who, in real life, was 17 years older than Gilbert and did not look like a spring chicken or a sexy Brazilian man. I bet you nearly everyone would have shut up about how unfair it was that Gilbert met the love of her life in Bali if they knew what he looked like in reality.

Elizabeth and Felipe on their wedding day

Elizabeth and Felipe on their wedding day

Third, I get the feeling that most people are unconsciously more annoyed with actress Julia Roberts than the (real-life) character of Elizabeth Gilbert herself. When I say Julia Roberts, you immediately think of romantic comedies. As a female, you become irritated because her romantic comedies make you feel bad about your own life (and that lazy boyfriend/husband of yours). As a male, you become irritated because every time your girlfriend/wife watches a Julia Roberts movie, she gets in a bad mood afterward over why you don’t act like the men wooing Ms. Roberts.  I swear, it’s almost like watching Pavlov’s dogs when I mention Julia Roberts.

Julia Roberts as Elizabeth Gilbert in "Eat, Pray, Love"

Julia Roberts as Elizabeth Gilbert in "Eat, Pray, Love"

The instant you heard Roberts’ name attached to Eat, Pray, Love you thought, “Oh GOD, another romantic comedy that will make me feel nauseous and bad about my own love life.” You then went into the film with that mentality without even considering the fact that the themes in Gilbert’s memoir were maybe more significant than what is usually presented in a Julia Roberts movie.

And they were more significant. I personally admire Elizabeth Gilbert (the author) for ending a marriage that she knew wasn’t working. Rather than live her life in misery, knowing that her growing unhappiness would eventually not only be a detriment to her mental and physical health but her husband’s as well, Gilbert chose to do a very difficult thing. How many people do you know would “stick it out” and hope that things get better when they already know deep down that it won’t and that it would only be a matter of time before things progressed from bad to worse?

Despite how indulgent that year abroad may have seemed, Gilbert was doing it because she did feel like she needed to get away and “discover” who she was. (And, let’s not forget, she had her own money to do so). I liked the fact that she stated upfront – “Since I was 15, I’ve been with a guy. I really need to be by myself for a while and get my shit together.”

A side note about the movie and Julia Roberts – both really weren’t that bad. Roberts may like to play it safe, but she does a good job in her roles. The movie never got over the top and made me want to hurl on the person sitting in front of me. I think Ryan Murphy did a fine job with this project.

The next time someone complains about Eat, Pray, Love, ask them for a legit reason as to why they didn’t like the movie and then tell them to go read her book.

Trailer for Eat, Pray, Love:

Julianne Moore, Fearlessness Personified

Monday, August 9th, 2010

The most beautiful picture ever taken

The most beautiful picture ever taken

I came across the most beautiful picture ever the other day. It’s actress Julianne Moore in an Alexander McQueen gown holding her baby daughter Liv Helen set across a backdrop of autumn leaves.

That got me thinking of Julianne Moore and the movies I had seen her in. I eventually came to the conclusion that she was one of the bravest and most raw actresses I had ever seen on screen, engaging in everything from taboo subject matter (incest, cannibalism) to “rated-R” sex and nudity. (Let’s just say you wouldn’t be comfortable watching most of Moore’s movies with your parents). Despite how distasteful that may sound, Moore manages to bring grace and elegance to every role. (And despite how much that sentence may have sounded like an oxymoron, I swear it’s true). Many of the films Moore has starred in have elements of darkness, and such explicit content only makes the performances more powerful and real. It doesn’t matter how you may personally feel about such material – I think we all have to agree that Moore is one brave lady.

When I think of an actress that’s the exact opposite of Moore, I think of Julia Roberts. Here’s a perky, beautiful actress who’s hardly ever appeared in a movie that made you do a double take. She’s America’s Sweetheart, an actress manufactured to appeal to the common masses. She’s a Disney character for adults, a woman who appears in movies you never have to think too deeply about because they’re simply not that important. You watch Julia Roberts in movies like Pretty Woman or Eat, Pray, Love. You watch Julianne Moore in Boogie Nights and Hannibal. Which one would you prefer? I thought so.

Julia Roberts is obviously not really like that in real life. She’s a hell of a lot more interesting. It’s just unfortunate that she doesn’t act in movies which require you to think too deeply. That’s a brand she’s fine with being labeled as, and while there’s nothing wrong with that, it unfortunately makes most of her movies terribly dull to watch.

I just personally like feeling uncomfortable or unsettled after watching a movie. Because by that very definition, it affected me in some way. It made me think about what I saw, long after the film has concluded. There wasn’t a clean-cut ending. And I can count on that whenever I watch a Julianne Moore movie. Her fearlessness is refreshing. Don’t mistake that for some twisted call for attention. Moore just doesn’t like to play it safe, and for that I have to salute her.

Some of my favorite Julianne Moore films -

Hannibal

Savage Grace

The Kids Are All Right

I’d Like to Appear as Tough as Angelina Jolie but I Laugh Too Much

Sunday, July 25th, 2010
Angelina Jolie in Salt

Angelina Jolie in Salt

I just watched Angelina Jolie’s Salt the other day and have to say -  it was better than I expected. Of course, in my case, it wasn’t really going to see the movie because I like Jolie, it was because I wanted to see a movie where a female lead wasn’t dependent on anyone else.

I mean, I watched Inception as well and thought – is it just me or has Marion Cotillard played a “beautiful but long-suffering housewife/girlfriend” in nearly all the movies she’s done after La vie en Rose? (Inception, Nine, Public Enemies, A Good Year). Talk about typecasting.

Anyway, back to Salt and Jolie – despite how ridiculous the action scenes in the movie were, I liked how intense and visceral the fight scene between Jolie and Liev Schreiber was at the end – “Forget about guns, let’s just beat each other up to a bloody pulp with our bare hands.”

I also thought the ending shot of Jolie – bloodied and exhausted, running through the snow-filled woods in DC wearing next to nothing after jumping into a lake from a helicopter and escaping – was interesting. We don’t know what will happen to her, but by god, she’ll be back with a vengeance. She’s Angelina Jolie.

Jezebel, Reuters, and Newsweek had some interesting comments about her -

You may know that Angelina’s part in Salt was written for Tom Cruise. But as As Jay A. Fernandez writes: “No actress in Hollywood history has been able to chisel out the supremacy Jolie has in a male-dominated genre.”

But here’s what’s bizarre: Angelina is totally believable firing a rifle from the hood of a speeding car, but not as a magazine editor plotting to lose a guy in ten days. Fernandez asks why Angelina can’t do romantic comedies:

“She’s too strong, she’s too forceful,” says Hollywood historian David Thomson (“Rosebud: The Story of Orson Welles”). “And that’s not just her screen character. It’s her public character, too. She’s not got that sort of availability for romance. She isn’t really sentimentally appealing. She needs to be doing strong things — crazy things, sometimes — to work on screen.”

“It’s definitely unusual that a female has become an action star,” “Salt” producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura says. “But it’s a funny thing. She’s not a female action star; she’s an action star. She’s really the first female to transcend gender. I don’t think it’s occurred before.”

Raina Kelly from Newsweek writes, “I don’t think we have any idea how much media we consume where the woman is the hapless ingenue waiting for her prince. I’m sick of adorably, clumsy cutie-pies: the Katherine Heigels, the Kate Hudsons, the Jennifer Anistons—I could die. I think that simpering sexist sickness, Sex and the City 2, was the last straw.”

Even though Jolie stars in some of the most unrealistic, outlandish action films I’ve ever seen – she’s more relatable to me than the typical rom-com women on screen. Because at least Jolie stars in movies where she doesn’t depend on someone else to save the day – she does it herself.

Sexual Tension and an Unlikely Female Role Model in Luc Besson’s “La Femme Nikita”

Monday, June 28th, 2010
La Femme Nikita

La Femme Nikita

I watched Luc Besson’s La Femme Nikita last month and came to the conclusion that that was the most realistic assassin movie ever made. It’s about Nikita, a teenage girl/street thug who is imprisoned for life after a robbery goes awry and she shoots a police officer dead. While in jail, the French intelligence agency is impressed with her brutality and decides to fake her death and train her to be an assassin. It takes them several years to get Nikita to settle down and take orders but she gets eventually emerges as a talented killer.

After leaving the agency, Nikita lives a relatively normal life with her supermarket cashier boyfriend while assassinating people on the side whenever contacted by the Agency. After a while, however, Nikita grows tired of the lifestyle. Her boyfriend is getting suspicious of her random disappearances and Nikita begins to regret the brutality of her actions. Even though all she does is shoot people from a distance (that’s pretty simple compared to all the other Hollywood assassin movies we’ve seen, am I right?), Nikita begins to hate her imprisonment by the Agency. The fact of the matter is – they own her. They spared her life in jail but made it clear that she was either going to be an assassin or they were going to kill her. At the end of the movie after an assassination gone wrong, (one which requires the ruthless participation of a “cleaner” in destroying the mission’s evidence and all the corpses), Nikita is shell-shocked and runs away from Paris, the Agency, and her supermarket cashier boyfriend.

That’s not an ending I think most of us are used to seeing. Why did she give up? That’s not what the “hero” of the movie is supposed to do. There’s always a clean conclusion in which he redeems himself and destroys his enemies. But there is no out for Nikita  – rather than live a life which will probably kill her (if not physically then mentally), Nikita runs away from her captors to live a new life without violence. That makes her admirable in a way – she refuses to conform to this destructive lifestyle, and decides to take matters into her own hands. Running away is not the most valiant of efforts, but Nikita is strong enough to realize this is wrong and do something about it.

Nikita and Bob

Nikita and Bob - sexual tension personified

What interested me most about the film, however, was the underlying sexual tension between Nikita and her older mentor, Bob. He advises her right from the very beginning, and watches her grow from a street thief to a femme fatale. Throughout the film, you can tell that Bob likes Nikita, something that Nikita picks up on. While she doesn’t do anything about it, you can tell she’s flattered. After a while, however, Nikita realizes her relationship with Bob is not healthy, especially since she now has a boyfriend and Bob interrupts her with assassination assignments at the most inopportune times.

During their last meeting near the end of the second act, Nikita begins to defy him –

Nikita: Interested in my vacation?   I know you and your sadistic games. You’re sick, Bob. I need to tell you that. Your job’s a sewer for you.

Bob:  I’m happy to see you. I miss the time when I had you to myself every day ….. An ambassador, leaving in five months. Get him before he goes. It’s your mission. Choose your team. You’ve got five months. The boss wants a clean, smooth job. I thought of you.

Nikita:  Always on two jobs at once?

Bob: It’s to show I love you.

“I miss the time when I had you to myself every day” would have been such a lovely phrase if it weren’t uttered under such circumstances. At this point, Nikita is sick of being chained to the Agency, and Bob only further serves to hold her down. Although we want Bob and Nikita to get together, it just wouldn’t be right. The sexual tension in this film is perfect – it exists to complicate matters between two characters who are inappropriate for one another but feels oddly right. That feeling is hard to shoot, and Besson pulls it off.

John Woo and the Women in his Action Films

Sunday, June 20th, 2010
Thandie Newton and Tom Cruise - the two most attractive film leads ever

Thandie Newton and Tom Cruise - the two most attractive film leads ever

I rewatched Mission: Impossible 2 about a month ago, was entranced by how good-looking Tom Cruise and Thandie Newton were back in 2000, and pretty much have had the movie on repeat for the past month. This components of the film – the actors, the soundtrack, the look, the action scenes – came together perfectly. John Woo really hit a home run with this one.

Great trailer for Mission: Impossible 2 (song in the trailer is a remix of the original Lalo Schifrin Mission Impossible theme by Limp Bizkit – dare I say, perhaps the best one)

One of the reasons why I liked this movie so much was because of Thandie Newton – she’s ridiculously beautiful and even though you want to hate her for it, can’t, because her character isn’t a dumb damsel in distress. She’s resourceful, strong-willed, and smart. If there’s anything that takes me out of a movie faster, it’s a stupid female lead.

That’s probably why I hated John Woo’s The Killer. The main female lead in the movie, Jennie, literally spends the entire time yelling and crying for Chow Yun Fat – “Jeff! Jeff! Jefffff!!!!! Where Arreeeeee you!!! JEFFFF!!!!!!!!!!” She does that because she’s nearly blind in the movie and physically helpless so I totally understand her panic.  BUT, John Woo insisted on putting her in nearly every action scene in the movie so we get the pleasure of listening to her scream for nearly 3/4ths of the film. While Chow Yun Fat is dodging bullets and shooting people with two guns, she’s running around making a racket.  After a while, my tolerance level shot down to a negative level and I hit the mute button. But even that wasn’t good enough because I had to watch her flail her arms around on screen, screaming and crying. And the subtitles were still there, so I could still hear her screeching in my head. Sally Yeh (the actress who played Jennie) supposedly disliked her character so much she refused to ever act again.  I’m not surprised. She’s the main complaint people have about the movie.

Trailer for The Killer:

Thankfully, John Woo appears to acknowledge this. In the commentary for Mission: Impossible 2, he states that Thandie’s character is the first strong female lead he’s ever had in a movie, and that he’s quite proud of this. I’m really hoping he decides to stick with the trend. A movie will only work if the leads don’t annoy the hell out of the audience.

I rewatched the first and third Mission: Impossible movies soon after the second one, and still believe the second one with Thandie Newton was the best. The women in the first movie don’t freaking do ANYTHING, and even though the three women in the third movie (Keri Russell, Maggie Q, and Michelle Monaghan) get to kick butt, there’s nothing about them that stands out to the audience in any way. They’re the minor supporting roles to Tom Cruise’s lead, and while there’s nothing wrong with that, it makes them instantly forgettable. Thandie Newton and Tom Cruise seemed like equals in the second movie, and that’s what made it so great. What I would give to see John Woo, Tom Cruise, and Thandie Newton reunited for another movie….

Mother and Child – Naomi Watts: A Somewhat Mirror Image of Myself

Tuesday, May 11th, 2010

Naomi Watts and Samuel L. Jackson

Naomi Watts and Samuel L. Jackson in "Mother and Child"

I’m not very intrigued by most women I see on the big-screen. They’re all very one-dimensional in some way, by no fault to the actress herself (because her role wasn’t fleshed out), and by no fault to the screenwriter (whose screenplay was most likely cut in half to make the movie more appealing to the mass audience). There are some whom I’ve admired because they’ve represented a career woman who (kind of) has it all, someone who I would like to emulate, but none that have really required me to think too deeply.

So it was interesting when I found Naomi Watt’s role in Rodrigo Garcia’s film “Mother and Child” to be completely fascinating. The movie is about “Karen (Annette Bening), a bitter physical therapist who envies her mother’s warm friendship with her housekeeper, who has a young daughter of her own. Karen resents this child, who reminds her of the baby she gave birth to and gave up for adoption. It is obvious — at least to the audience — that this baby, born when Karen was just 14, has grown up to be Elizabeth (Naomi Watts), a lawyer who also lives in Los Angeles, suspecting that her mother is out there somewhere.” (Thank you, NY Times, you guys always have the best descriptions).

Lovely trailer featuring the song “Little One” by Lucy Schwartz

I think a lot of people will hate Naomi Watts’s character. I like the NY Times’ description of her the best – “Elizabeth is ambitious and aloof, and uses her sexuality both as a way of drawing people to her and punishing them for her earlier abandonment. She seduces her new boss, Paul (Samuel L. Jackson), who is both intoxicated and terrified by her self-control. She also, out of what seems to be sheer meanness, goes to bed with a next-door neighbor whose wife is cheerful, pregnant and outgoing — everything Elizabeth is determined never to be.” Even worse, Watts leaves her underwear in the wife’s underwear drawer before sleeping with the husband, hoping the wife finds out. You kind of want to have her shot for this, but can’t help and sympathize where she is coming from.

Watts is angry because she was given up for adoption, her birth mother never searched for her, and she is not close to anyone in her life. She’s been completely independent since her late teen years, and made her way in the world with little help from anyone, including her adoptive parents. She’s turned out well as a high-powered lawyer, but is determined to stay independent and to never marry. Watch the clip below to see how she describes herself.

Despite how professional and impressive she looks and sounds, I don’t think I’ve seen someone with so much sadness inside. And unfortunately, I kind of see myself in her, not in terms of my mental state, but just by how independent we both were at a young age, how that has carried over to our lives now, and how that might affect our future.

My parents worked all the time when I was growing up, so I hardly ever saw them. I began stay home alone since the fifth grade (walk home, let myself in, do my homework, and watch cartoons on the WB). I didn’t have any siblings, so I always had to entertain myself in some way (I remember a lot of running around outside and watching movies). When it was time for college, I left home (Los Angeles) and moved to Ithaca, NY for Cornell (which is about the farthest you can possibly get from LA). And now, on the verge of graduating from college, I’ll be moving to St. Petersburg, FL, to work at American Express. In both cases, I threw myself in situations where I didn’t know anyone there, but I really like that characteristic of myself. Of being able to go anywhere, anytime, of doing whatever I felt would suit me the best – “I’ve gone wherever I’ve had to go to get ahead.”  I value my independence as well.

Now, I wouldn’t consider myself a loner in any way – I actually think I’m one of the most extroverted and friendly people I know, but I value my time alone. I think it’s fine to not have to be with someone 24/7 – I went on vacation for a week with a friend once one summer, and it was one of the most irritating experiences of my life. They were just always THERE. (Here’s a hint, if you go on vacation with someone, try to spend some time apart so you don’t end up killing each other).

I like to describe myself like this – I’m extremely outgoing around people, and am not shy in the least, but I do have a tendency to “shut down” when I go home and am alone.

Sometimes, I do find myself getting annoyed by people who always need to be with others, who always need to be in a relationship with someone, etc. They don’t like watching movies alone, buying groceries alone, etc, and they always need to call someone at the end of the day – “I need to know that I can talk to my boyfriend every night!”

I feel that one of the reasons why I’ve never felt the need to be in a relationship is because I’m extremely close to my best friend, Losmeiya (another single child). We’ve been best friends since first grade, and she knows me better than anyone else in this world. She’s one of the most genuinely good people I know, and I consider myself truly blessed to have a friend like her. I probably only get to see Losmeiya physically 4-5 times a year because she lives across the country, but we email and call each other so much it almost feels like she’s living next door.

However, even though I’m close with Losmeiya, she doesn’t define me or complete me in any way. I still think I’m one of the most independent people I know. And I like that about myself. I have the luxury of doing whatever I want and moving wherever I please without having to compromise for someone else. People who always cling to someone else, who jump from relationship to relationship, exasperate me. I am obviously jealous that they have someone, but I also view having to depend on someone else almost as a weakness. I want others to view me for myself, not for being the “girlfriend or wife of Person X”

Like Naomi Watts in the film, I’m irritated by something other people have that I’ve never experienced myself (love from a parent or partner). I certainly hope it will happen soon, but I’m definitely at a point in my life (22 years old) when my mom is starting to get a little frantic as to why I’ve never dated anyone, and always asks me about this whenever she calls.

It’s times like that when I begin to understand why Watts decides to do what she does. You begin to wonder if someone might be wrong with you, because you like being alone, and that’s why you’ve never dated or loved anyone. You then get angry because hell, something probably is wrong with you, and decide to take this anger out on others, such as seducing your boss and sleeping with your pregnant neighbor’s husband just because you can.

I don’t worry that I will anything even remotely horrific because 1) I believe in karma, and that whatever I do unto others will happen to me, 2) I have strong personal morals, and 3) I tell Losmeiya everything and she would probably fly across the country and slap me for even entertaining such thoughts. Losmeiya is one of the most morally upstanding people I know, and her opinion matters a lot to me. So, by default, I am one of the most morally upstanding people I know.

What’s the takeaway? Don’t be quick to judge others who’ve done something horrific too harshly until you’ve figured out why they did what they did. I don’t admire Naomi Watts’ character in any way, but I do understand where her anger is coming from.